<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discourse, Fandom, Methodology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superfani.com/2009/06/29/discourse-fandom-methodology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superfani.com/2009/06/29/discourse-fandom-methodology/</link>
	<description>blasting off again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghostlightning</title>
		<link>http://superfani.com/2009/06/29/discourse-fandom-methodology/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ghostlightning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfani.com/?p=4677#comment-1160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was quick! Good stuff here.

Meaning takes place through discourse... first between subject and the self, then between the self and the self&#039;s own ideas/memory etc, and &lt;i&gt;then&lt;/i&gt; goes further via sharing with others.

It is in the latter part of the process where I place your ideas on the emergence of the fandom, as an ideology. The fandom trades with itself ideas as material:

&quot;What does Haruhi mean for us?&quot;
&quot;How do we feel when outsiders tell anyone who would listen that Haruhi is overrated?&quot;

etc.

Then there is the interesting phenomenon of jockeying within a perceived internal hierarchy within fandoms! Check out fandom-specific forums (i.e. Macross World Forums) and you&#039;ll see very overt status symbols taking note of records such as number of posts made/level of participation. There are contests based on trivia and minutiae regarding the respective subjects. Participation in/exhibition of such behaviors seem to answer the question &quot;who&#039;s the bigger/better fan?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was quick! Good stuff here.</p>
<p>Meaning takes place through discourse&#8230; first between subject and the self, then between the self and the self&#8217;s own ideas/memory etc, and <i>then</i> goes further via sharing with others.</p>
<p>It is in the latter part of the process where I place your ideas on the emergence of the fandom, as an ideology. The fandom trades with itself ideas as material:</p>
<p>&#8220;What does Haruhi mean for us?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;How do we feel when outsiders tell anyone who would listen that Haruhi is overrated?&#8221;</p>
<p>etc.</p>
<p>Then there is the interesting phenomenon of jockeying within a perceived internal hierarchy within fandoms! Check out fandom-specific forums (i.e. Macross World Forums) and you&#8217;ll see very overt status symbols taking note of records such as number of posts made/level of participation. There are contests based on trivia and minutiae regarding the respective subjects. Participation in/exhibition of such behaviors seem to answer the question &#8220;who&#8217;s the bigger/better fan?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

