<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adventures in Criticism pt. 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superfani.com/2009/01/02/adventures-in-criticism-pt-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superfani.com/2009/01/02/adventures-in-criticism-pt-2/</link>
	<description>blasting off again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art and Aniblogging: A Non-Critical Take on Criticism — Memories of Eternity</title>
		<link>http://superfani.com/2009/01/02/adventures-in-criticism-pt-2/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art and Aniblogging: A Non-Critical Take on Criticism — Memories of Eternity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfani.com/?p=2920#comment-378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is up to the task, and I trust in your archive digging skills, but Cuchlann&#8217;s Adventures in Criticism proved to be quite interesting, in addition to Pontifus&#8217;s conversation on Critic vs [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is up to the task, and I trust in your archive digging skills, but Cuchlann&#8217;s Adventures in Criticism proved to be quite interesting, in addition to Pontifus&#8217;s conversation on Critic vs [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuchlann</title>
		<link>http://superfani.com/2009/01/02/adventures-in-criticism-pt-2/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cuchlann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 09:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfani.com/?p=2920#comment-377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah - my ex was a philosophy major, and she considered me to be relatively well-read (considering I wasn&#039;t a philosophy major), and almost all the things I knew about the field I had gotten from literary theory classes.  And a little from my honors courses, but still.  : )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; my ex was a philosophy major, and she considered me to be relatively well-read (considering I wasn&#8217;t a philosophy major), and almost all the things I knew about the field I had gotten from literary theory classes.  And a little from my honors courses, but still.  : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghostlightning</title>
		<link>http://superfani.com/2009/01/02/adventures-in-criticism-pt-2/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ghostlightning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfani.com/?p=2920#comment-376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is the appreciation of criticism different from the appreciation of philosophy is puzzling. Philosophical works are treated as literature, and criticism is treated as a work a step removed from it.

Philosophy, is criticism, of something as nebulous as reality. Criticism is philosophy, in theory form, and applied to tangible cases - completed works of fiction, etc.

I majored in literature with a minor in philosophy. In the lit department, criticism was hypocritically treated as a necessary evil. The professors saw their works as &#039;scholarship&#039; and &#039;appreciation&#039;. When I joined that faculty, I spent most of my time in the philosophy department (where they converted their conference room into a smoking lounge), and where the professors gleefully used literary examples to illustrate their philosophical points.

&gt;&gt;I view criticism merely as another form of entertainment, a different genre than poetry or fiction, but ultimately having the same goal at its core:  to amuse the audience for a while.

And to the levels of how amusing can it get. That is an extent of my ambition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is the appreciation of criticism different from the appreciation of philosophy is puzzling. Philosophical works are treated as literature, and criticism is treated as a work a step removed from it.</p>
<p>Philosophy, is criticism, of something as nebulous as reality. Criticism is philosophy, in theory form, and applied to tangible cases &#8211; completed works of fiction, etc.</p>
<p>I majored in literature with a minor in philosophy. In the lit department, criticism was hypocritically treated as a necessary evil. The professors saw their works as &#8216;scholarship&#8217; and &#8216;appreciation&#8217;. When I joined that faculty, I spent most of my time in the philosophy department (where they converted their conference room into a smoking lounge), and where the professors gleefully used literary examples to illustrate their philosophical points.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;I view criticism merely as another form of entertainment, a different genre than poetry or fiction, but ultimately having the same goal at its core:  to amuse the audience for a while.</p>
<p>And to the levels of how amusing can it get. That is an extent of my ambition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

