The hand-made planet

By Pontifus on 4 November 2008 | Anime | 7 Comments

Wow, the old guy to the right does not look pleased.

I mentioned last time, after extended namedropping of Joyce and Aquinas, that Aqua is a powerful setting. We can assume as much from the first episode of Aria (that’s the Animation, you’ll recall), and from speculative and animated settings wielding the de facto thought-provocation that they do (more on this later), but the fourth episode doesn’t let us forget it (never mind that the above screen capture is from episode twelve). The mysterious girl in the alley, the too-late video message and its contents — all elements seem bent toward drawing our attention to Aqua’s owing its existence and nature to human beings. Here, Aria provides another way of looking at both itself and the ever-ridiculous species that produced it, albeit one more obvious than the “shut your eyes and see” business of the first episode. But to what end?

So that people like me can write series of blog posts about it, of course. Why else?

Let’s look at that term — “hand-made planet.” Akari seems pleased with the distinction when she mentions it at the bridge during the twelfth episode, but that may not say much; Akari is pleased with everything. In itself, it’s not a positive (or negative) value judgment. In fact, Aria provides two examples of planets impacted by humans: Aqua, the planet formerly known as Mars, made habitable and tranquil by force of human effort, and Earth…I mean, Manhome, which, by all reports, is polluted well beyond the point of unpleasantness. One might argue that Aqua is more hand-made than Manhome, which I suppose holds to scrutiny, but it isn’t really more hand-made by much; consider that, in the Aria-verse, water existed below the surface of Mars, simply waiting for enterprising humans to dig it up. The planet met its “makers” halfway.

It’s really the attitude of a place that determines how hand-made it is. Were Aqua terraformed and left as unpopulated wilderness, I doubt Akari would be going on about how it’s a hand-made planet — hell, she wouldn’t even be present to make the comment, more likely than not. Consider the gravity of a handcrafted object — say, a desk built by your great-grandfather. It may not function any better than a mass-produced Wal-Mart desk, but it has a personally relevant history that spans from its creation to its current user and use, including every family member into whose hands it passed in the meantime, perhaps rendering it more desirable to have around than just any old desk. We might also elaborate by saying that the desk’s history exists because of its place in human memory; if not for that, it would be just any old desk, at least for all intents and purposes. It’s the remembered human impact, the lingering “ghosts,” that contribute to the desk’s emotional value.

Aqua has its own ghosts — literally.

Did I mention spoilers?

Alright, that one might technically be a cat. But it’s a cat which, by all rights, should be long dead, so it’s probably a ghost (or some kind of cat-fairy, maybe). Either way, the cats in Aria serve as connections to Aqua’s past. I’m using “ghost” here in a broad sense anyway; in episodes twelve and thirteen, we see that Aqua even harbors ghosts of itself, and I don’t know how to account for that in the common definition of ghosthood. The point is that Aqua’s “hand-madeness” is important in part because it began the imposition of human meaning upon Aqua — or, rather, upon Aqua as such; Mars existed previously, of course, but, given the apparent weight of names in Aria, we can probably grant that Aqua and Mars have partially separate identities simply due to the disparity of their nomenclature.

Simply by watching Aria, we can observe the results of Aqua’s being hand-made: it’s a setting that seems conducive to introspection and self-discovery, if the way the central characters (and Akari in particular) use Aqua is any indication. But consider why it serves this purpose for Akari and others. That Aqua was terraformed and made habitable by human beings ultimately doesn’t seem to have much to do with it; rather, Akari’s positive attitude toward the past and present of the place allows her to seek herself among the planet’s nuances. Sure, Aqua is hand-made in the sense that humans “made” it out of Mars, but it’s filled with philosophical import by Akari herself, who knows where and how to look to get what she wants out of the place. It’s an existential conundrum of sorts: one cannot love a place because it feels like home, one must love a place in order for it to feel like home. Ultimately, Akari’s hands make Aqua into the setting we see when we watch Aria — consider that the strange ghostly encounters and strategic time travel only happen when she’s present.

It is with such things in mind that we compare Aqua to our own experience on Earth — and, as I said, Aqua’s being both science-fictional and animated urges us to make that comparison. Interpretive settings, reliant as they are on the human creative machine, tend to work that way, I think. It’s a very potent comparison, with weighty questions inherent: If I like my home, is it because I’m approaching it as Akari approaches Aqua? If I don’t, is it because I’m not? Am I incapable of liking my home — not because there’s anything wrong with the place, but because there’s something wrong with my way of thinking?

After all, that’s what it comes down to. We have our Earth, and we can do with it what we will. Should we approach our places of residence with Akari’s “love first, ask questions later” angle, should we hand-make of our surroundings something useful, we may get as much out of our locales as she does.

This whole scene gets me every time.

But wait! There’s more!

Let’s not oversimplify. It’s likely that Aqua has its share of problems, and often we must infer these from the view we’re given through Akari’s rose-tinted glasses. Consider Akatsuki’s borrowing money from his brother; could this mean that the people who control the weather are underpaid? That’s an important job, and such a situation wouldn’t say much in favor of Aqua’s economy. Perhaps Akari has the luxury of introspection because Aqua’s economy is a one-trick pony, and the tourism industry, spearheaded by the undines, brings in all the money. It’s hard to be sure, but, at the very least, we can probably conclude that it’s best not to blind oneself to reality while appreciating one’s surroundings, that balance is key — balance such as that which exists between Akari, Aika, and Alice. But that, good reader, is a topic for a later post.

7 Responses to “The hand-made planet”

  1. My inability to participate in this discourse is becoming unbearable. I will get my subs of Aria by tonight hopefully and I will have my revenge on my ignorance.

  2. I’ve STARTED. Now I’ve only seen an episode, but I’ve already bought into the world-building aspect of the anime. So Aqua is Mars and Man-home is Earth.

    The naming alone already does some violence to Aqua, which has become more watery than Earth – a significant detail I think. Calling Earth Man-home may be an innocent enough reminder to all people wherever they end up, but it also imposes an unstated ‘the’. It occurs to me, if read in a way, as ‘The’ Man-home. It signifies the lack of fitness of a world like Aqua for humans.

    I don’t know if this would lead to a hegemonic discourse later on, but I like it. Not so much as a pursuit of political conflict, but since plots require conflict, even something as quiet as this anime, I like the subtle promise. And if it is indeed fulfilled, it would be in understated ways such as the hint that meteorological control employees may be underpaid.

  3. Pontifus says:

    That’s an interesting take on Manhome, especially considering that (and I mentioned this above, but it’s still kind of a spoiler if you’ve only seen one episode) Manhome is continually described as undesirable. I won’t elaborate, as these hints are dropped throughout the series until almost the end, but I’m curious as to how your line of reasoning here will develop.

    Oh, and let me know how you like it along the way, too. Maybe criticism is supposed to disregard personal preference, but personal preference can at least hang out alongside criticism, and I’m not at all convinced that it’s possible to keep one’s level of affection for the work in question out of criticism anyway.

  4. That’s fanalysis for me. Complete objectivity is a false god, as far as I’m concerned regarding criticism. I relate to myself as a reader and not a critic to align myself with the consumers, the co-objectifiers of the subject text. Even if they/we are co-creators of their personal experience anyway, I’m also much interested in the creation of the collective experience – which discussion in fora like this one I very much appreciate.

    We’ll be watching more of it over the next few days. It really helps that the wife is getting into it – without whose interest there will be far less anime viewing for me.

  5. MY REVENGE IS AT HAND. I’VE COMPLETED THE 13 EPISODES. THE WAIFU IS A CONVERT AS WELL. LIFE IS WON.

    Sorry about that, comrade. I’ve sort of used these 2 posts of yours as touchstones for my own growth as an anime enthusiast.

    This series is so good that it deserves posts like the previous one. I will make my own, and I’m lucky to be a fan of Kim Stanley Robinson’s Martian Chronicles (Red Mars, Green Mars, Blue Mars). Aqua is way past the Blue Mars era of the narrative, but reading those books will give you an appreciation of what went behind the scened in the exodus from Man-home to Aqua. If I read them again they will read like the history of Aqua. It’s almost a point-for-point fit, though of course with the books being hard science fiction it will deliver far less blissful moments of tranquility and beauty.

    If you do read them, I do believe they will add value to your appreciation of Aria, albeit in an indirect fashion. In any case, those books will address the core questions of this post without a doubt in my mind.

  6. Pontifus says:

    I’m pleased that the posts did something for you. There’s more to come, though it may not seem like it, given how long it’s been since I last posted; I’m stuck in the middle of another Aria post, actually, and as I’m also afflicted with the typical laziness brought on by a break from school, my productivity is shot. But I’m working on it.

    As to the last post (I’ll go ahead and respond here): I tried to include as much Joyce as one would need to know in the post. I suppose comprehensive knowledge of Ulysses would make the post more useful, but I don’t think it’s necessary. And I can back up Aria’s serving as a lesson on how to enjoy slice of life with the fact that I enjoy slice of life far more now than I did before I watched Aria. It may not work for everyone, I guess, but it did work for me.

    I’m not familiar with Robinson, but if his work can be tied into Aria, and can serve to fill in some background details, I’m all for reading it. I’ll add that to my daunting reading list.

  7. [...] find Pontifus’ commentary on Aria’s world-building to be quite useful. An excerpt: Let’s look at that term — [...]

Leave a Reply