Misogyny or misinterpretation?

Misogyny might be — nay, probably is — too strong a word for certain events of Nogizaka Haruka no Himitsu’s tenth episode. It’s just that the “m” alliterates. You understand the importance of titular alliteration, I’m sure.

In particular, I’m referring to the Miss Hakujou Academy competition, in which Haruka participates as the returning champion during episode ten. Regarding its place among the goings-on of the episode, and of the series proper, it’s a minor event, functioning as little more than a testament to Haruka’s conventional perfection — while love rival Shiina enters as well, she never seems too put out by her loss, and she isn’t a very proactive love rival anyway. Yuuto’s friends explain the Miss Con, as they call it: though it’s never clear who decides the winner from among the final eight, said eight are chosen by vote. And who’s eligible to vote? The male students.

The male students specifically. But not the female students.

My first inclination was to call foul on the Hakujou Academy administration. Really, a competition for girls laid exclusively in the hands of high school guys, at least in its early stages? Is that wise? I’m not saying all high school guys are bastards, and it’s true that a few of them, at least, seemed impressed with the full gamut of Haruka’s many qualifications back in episode one, but, thanks to a volatile combination of physical development and social influences, high school guys on the whole have certain collective priorities. I suspect that any girl in a contest whose contestants are siphoned by a group of fifteen to eighteen year old males isn’t there because she can play the piano.

But who knows? It’s been a while since I’ve even been inside a high school. Maybe piano has recently replaced physical appearance as the leading attractor of young male interest. And there’s also the matter of Japan not being the country with which I have personal high school experience. My instincts tell me, though, that teenage guys are teenage guys, no matter where you go.

As I said, “misogyny” may be too strong a verdict here, especially where Hakujou’s male students are concerned. But if we look at it practically, the Hakujou administration has effectively silenced the female fraction of the student body on the matter of determining a girl’s worth — and, in doing so, has possibly encouraged the male students to follow suit. Consider the above picture, in which Yuuto’s friends interrupt his conversation with Shiina, relegating the Miss Con competitor to the background as they detail the competition in her stead. Shiina’s mild expression of “what the fuck, guys” is particularly poignant. Are we to take this as a warning of what can happen when authority-wielding institutions make bad decisions? I don’t know enough about the present state of Japanese high schools (and I’m not versed nearly enough in feminist criticism) to put it in a more specific context, so if you do, please enlighten me.

It’s entirely possible that I’m making something out of nothing here. Upon scouring the aniblogosphere for opinions offered by my contemporaries on the matter, I found that the Miss Hakujou Academy competition’s patriarchy didn’t stand out to the community proper, or at least not enough to garner words from the eight or so blogs I consulted. Have I fallen prey to a mistranslation, perhaps? My knowledge of Japanese being shoddy, at best, I’m a slave to subtitles and the subtitlers who write them. I’ve consulted two subbed versions of the episode on the matter, the second differing very little in its translation of the Miss Con explanation from the one pictured above, but the Brock-looking fellow on the left doesn’t exactly enunciate, and it’s possible that I’ve been led astray twice.

Perhaps it simply doesn’t matter that the Miss Con is a paragon of patriarchy. Or maybe it’s a good thing, a way of bringing the sexes together. Consider that Haruka has as many female worshipers as male, at least apparently so; clearly the girls have a vested interest in the picking of favorites. Resting the choice of Miss Con finalists in the hands of the guys may be a way of instilling a valuable lesson about cooperation between the sexes. They’ll have to coexist with their female classmates until graduation; imagine the hell a young man’s life would become if a group of high school girls decided to exact vengeance upon him in answer to his valuing the physical appearance of his Miss Con choices over their other qualities. Such an explanation might make light of the Hakujou administration’s phallocentrism, true, but nobody seems too perturbed by it anyway.

Advertisement
Leave a comment

6 Comments

  1. Haha, all the competition reminded me of when I went through this episode was SaiMoe, but an interesting perspective nonetheless. The shallow shows are the most fun to deconstruct, no?

    I would imagine that allowing the women to vote wouldn’t improve things a lot, being that it would just bring massive block voting (i.e. popularity factions; you know those evil Japanese schoolgirls) to the table, but hey, at least it’ll be ‘fairer’. Who knows.

    Maybe there’s a Mister (?) Con sometime during the year as well…I do agree that, as insane as all these events seem, it must bring into play some strange dynamics for the rest of the year…

    Reply
  2. I’m not watching NHnH, so I can’t comment in detail, but my instinctive reaction is that it probably is reason to call foul, but it probably isn’t remarkable. This is anime, after all: phallocentricisim here is like graphic and unnecessary violence in a chanson de geste, so omnipresent that it’s transparent.

    [I'm sounding far too progressive today. I'd better go and read some right-wing hang'em and flog'em blogs for a bit.]

    Reply
  3. Pontifus

     /  30 September 2008

    @CCY

    Yeah, I like to dig into shows that could easily be considered shallow. In a recent conversation, lelangir pointed out that my vast enthusiasm for Elfen Lied is perhaps a bit odd, and I can’t argue with that, but I can’t help myself. Really, I’d say that “depth” isn’t something that’s inherent in a work of art, it’s a factor of how deep people are willing to dig.

    I had the same thoughts regarding the possibility of a Mr. Con. If Nogizaka Haruka continues, I’d very much like to see such a thing…though I can’t see Yuuto even being chosen to participate, given his taking so much popularity damage on Haruka’s behalf (and he didn’t seem to be uncommonly well-loved beforehand, either).

    @IKnight

    So true that anime (or at least a big chunk of it) is a man’s world in general. I felt the urge to turn this into a treatise on misogyny in fandom, perhaps pulling in stuff like this, but that sort of thing is way over my head right now. It’s a big issue, and I’m all worn out…maybe I’ll get to it when grad school applications are out of the way. Also, allow me to belatedly welcome you back to the universe…er, the internet (I tend to confuse the two).

    Reply
  4. Makes me wonder how apt you find Miyazaki’s quote under the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mo%C3%A9 page. It’s true that a certain degree of what people consider moe stems from making the character look (and actually be) helpless… sort of like the way people think babies and puppies are cute because of that helplessness.

    In any event, I can’t stand the character worshiping that comes with SaiMoe. The fact that there’s more than one moe tournament in existence is cause for great aggravation on my part.

    Reply
  5. Pontifus

     /  4 October 2008

    @zzeroparticle

    Sorry, the spam catcher caught your comment for some reason.

    Miyazaki’s comment certainly applies to part of the fandom, at least. I wrote a post about moe a while ago (which reminds me, I guess I should get a working archive of the old site up…), and I concluded that it’s alright in moderation — I mean, where moe exists, there also seems to exist the potential for less-than-positive portrayals of women, but some shows do alright, and I’d be lying if I said I’m entirely immune to the moe phenomenon myself. I’ve never studied feminist criticism in great detail, but I tend to be watchful of these things anyway.

    I’ve never really followed SaiMoe, or anything along those lines. What is it about them that bothers you? Is moe just not your thing, or do they come across as part of a gender portrayal issue?

    Reply
  6. Mostly the character worshiping and the fanboy wars that erupt as a result.

    It’s not to say that I don’t have favorite characters or anything like that, but I just never looked at it through the lens of the SaiMoe participant. That is, to put into terms as to what that character means to me personally and the influx of emotions that the character invokes within me. Rather, I tend to look at the characters more dispassionately: how well they’re described, how well they’re developed, are their motivations contrived, how they fit in with the show, you get the idea.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s